Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 SEPTEMBER 2026

Analyzing Whether An HSR Filing Is Necessary: Lessons For Transacting Parties From Enforcement Actions

Ballard Spahr LLP
Ballard Spahr LLP
Contributor
Ballard Spahr LLP

Ballard Spahr LLP

Ballard Spahr LLP, an AmLaw 100 law firm with 19 US offices, serves clients in more than 50...

View firm profile
Explore more from Ballard Spahr LLP

Recent enforcement actions reveal heightened scrutiny of deal structures that may circumvent Hart-Scott-Rodino Act filing requirements. Federal regulators are pursuing record-breaking civil penalties against parties who structure transactions, valuations, or timing to avoid or delay mandatory premerger notifications, with recent penalties reaching $12 million and $250 million respectively.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

Summary

Recent agency actions make clear that how transacting parties structure deals may create significant enforcement risk if reviewing agencies perceive that the parties structured a deal to avoid or delay regulatory filings required by the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Act.

The Upshot

  • The HSR Act requires parties to notify the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Department of Justice (DOJ) before consummating mergers or acquisitions that meet certain size thresholds and observe a statutory waiting period (generally 30 calendar days) before they can close.
  • Regulators historically have stated that parties may not structure transactions, valuations, or deal timing for the purpose of avoiding or delaying these filing obligations.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from