Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 SEPTEMBER 2007

Insurance/Reinsurance: Settlement Agreements

A recent High Court decision in the on-going case between the Korean National Insurance Corporation (“KNIC”) and its reinsurers highlighted:

United KingdomTransport
James Marron
James Marron
Neil Beighton
Neil Beighton

A recent High Court decision in the on-going case between the Korean National Insurance Corporation ("KNIC") and its reinsurers highlighted:

  • The need for settlements between insurers to be evidenced in writing, particularly in large and/or complex disputes.
  • A claimant is entitled to commence representative proceedings against a lead reinsurer as the only named defendant and, if the named defendant has the same interest as all the other parties which it represented, does not need to go to the hassle and expense of serving all named (re)insurers subscribing to the policy. Commencing proceedings against a subscription market has historically tended to give rise to procedural and practical difficulties, because of the need to identify and serve each of the syndicates and companies participating on the risk. This decision may assist in saving time and costs in commencing proceedings.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from