Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 DECEMBER 2010

Judicial Review of Funding Decisions

The inevitable consequence of the recent spending review is that funding decisions made by public bodies will be subject to immense scrutiny over the coming months.

United KingdomStrategy

The inevitable consequence of the recent spending review is that funding decisions made by public bodies will be subject to immense scrutiny over the coming months. Decision makers should therefore take care to ensure that such decisions are made in accordance with public law principles. If not, any affected party could seek to challenge that decision by way of judicial review in the courts on the basis that the decision was illegal, irrational, unreasonable and/or unfair. Court proceedings must be commenced within 3 months of the date of the decision, if not sooner, although the parties are expected to set out the grounds of challenge and response in writing before contemplating court. If the court upholds the challenge, it can order that the original decision be quashed, retaken and/or declare that the public body has acted unlawfully etc. The cost and time engaged in defending challenges can be significant.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from