Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 DECEMBER 2024

Switaj -v- McClenaghan [2024] EWCA Civ 1457

Gatehouse Chambers
Gatehouse Chambers
Contributor
Gatehouse Chambers

Gatehouse Chambers

Gatehouse Chambers is a leading commercial set with expertise spanning commercial dispute...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gatehouse Chambers

The Court of Appeal ruled that payments made before the Tenant Fees Act 2019 do not invalidate a landlord's s.21 possession claim, even if the fees were retained after the Act's implementation.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

The Court of Appeal recently considered whether or not fees which were paid by a tenant before the enactment of the Tenant Fees Act 2019 ("TFA") could preclude a landlord from recovering possession under s.21 of the Housing Act 1988.

Facts

The Appellant, Ms Switaj, was the tenant of a flat in Holloway. She originally took up occupation of the flat in April 2018, pursuant to the grant of a 12-month AST ("Original AST"). The Respondent, Mr McClenaghan, was the landlord.

In addition to the payment of rent and a security deposit, the Original AST required payment of the following sums: (a) £120 plus VAT in respect of an "admin fee" for preparing any documents relating to any renewal of the tenancy; and (b) an unquantified "check out fee" (together the "Original Fees"). The Original Fees were paid by Ms Switaj to the landlord's agents in March and April 2018.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from