Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JULY 2012

Guarantors Not Always Guaranteed

DMH Stallard LLP
DMH Stallard LLP
Contributor
DMH Stallard LLP

DMH Stallard LLP

DMH Stallard delivers successful outcomes for businesses and individuals by providing tailored...

View firm profile
Explore more from DMH Stallard LLP

As is well known, where the matrimonial home is offered as security for a loan, there can be "undue influence" where one spouse has "trust and confidence, reliance dependence or "vulnerability" and the other has "ascendancy, domination or control".

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
James Regan
James Regan

As is well known, where the matrimonial home is offered as security for a loan, there can be "undue influence" where one spouse has "trust and confidence, reliance dependence or "vulnerability" and the other has "ascendancy, domination or control".

Recent case law has extended this principle to a guarantee of a tenant's covenants under a lease. Where there is undue influence, the guarantee may be unenforceable.

A company employee (who was not a director) had signed a lease as guarantor, at the request of one of his company directors, without having been advised about the nature of the document or offered the opportunity to take legal advice.

The court held that the employee had established a defence on the basis that he was unaware of the true nature of the document but also that there had been undue influence.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from