Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 OCTOBER 2026

Cladding Case Puts Landlords' Repairing Covenants Under The Spotlight

DMH Stallard LLP
DMH Stallard LLP
Contributor
DMH Stallard LLP

DMH Stallard LLP

DMH Stallard delivers successful outcomes for businesses and individuals by providing tailored...

View firm profile
Explore more from DMH Stallard LLP

The case concerns a dispute between a commercial landlord and tenant over responsibility for remediating combustible cladding at a hotel near Wembley Stadium. As the building is a hotel rather than a residential block, remediation orders under the Building Safety Act 2022 do not apply.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

The case concerns a dispute between a commercial landlord and tenant over responsibility for remediating combustible cladding at a hotel near Wembley Stadium. As the building is a hotel rather than a residential block, remediation orders under the Building Safety Act 2022 do not apply. Therefore, the key issues fell to be determined by the terms of the lease.

The facts

The cladding in question was added to the building in 2005 by the then owner, Essendi UK Hotels 2 Ltd (“Essendi”). In 2007, Essendi sold the building but took a lease (the “Original Lease”) from the new owner. The Original Lease included bespoke provisions making Essendi responsible for cladding defects until 2017, thereafter, responsibility passed to the landlord.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from