Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 OCTOBER 2011

Adjudication: Was There More Than One Dispute?

Fenwick Elliott LLP
Fenwick Elliott LLP
Contributor
Fenwick Elliott LLP

Fenwick Elliott LLP

Fenwick Elliott provides a comprehensive range of legal services on every aspect of the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Fenwick Elliott LLP

In the case of "Witney Town Council v Beam Construction (Cheltenham) Ltd" [2011] EWHC 2332 (TCC), Mr Justice Akenhead had to consider whether more than one dispute had been referred to adjudication. If that was the position, then the adjudicator’s decision could not be enforced.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

In the case of Witney Town Council v Beam Construction (Cheltenham) Ltd [2011] EWHC 2332 (TCC), Mr Justice Akenhead had to consider whether more than one dispute had been referred to adjudication. If that was the position, then the adjudicator's decision could not be enforced.

The Facts:

In early 2010, Witney Town Council ("the Council") engaged Beam Construction (Cheltenham) Ltd ("Beam") to design and construct the new Madley Park Community Hall in Witney, Oxfordshire for the Contract Sum of £749,726. The contract required the works to be complete by 7 November 2010; however, the works were late. Eventually, the Contract Administer awarded a three-week extension of time such that the new completion date would be 26 November 2010.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from