Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 JANUARY 2013

Adjudication – Enforcement

Fenwick Elliott LLP
Fenwick Elliott LLP
Contributor
Fenwick Elliott LLP

Fenwick Elliott LLP

Fenwick Elliott provides a comprehensive range of legal services on every aspect of the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Fenwick Elliott LLP

The Scottish case of SW Global Resourcing Ltd v Morris & Spottiswood Ltd, [2012] CSOH 200, concerned the enforcement of an adjudicator’s decision for an alleged breach of the rules of natural justice and apparent bias; failure to exhaust remit; ultra vires; Wednesday unreasonableness and internal contradictions; and lack of adequate reasoning

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

The Scottish case of SW Global Resourcing Ltd v Morris & Spottiswood Ltd, [2012] CSOH 200, concerned the enforcement of an adjudicator's decision for an alleged breach of the rules of natural justice and apparent bias; failure to exhaust remit; ultra vires; Wednesday unreasonableness and internal contradictions; and lack of adequate reasoning.

The Facts

Morris & Spottiswood Ltd ("M&S") was the main contractor employed by Historic Scotland to carry out building works at Stirling Castle. SW Global ("SW") was a subcontractor. The subcontract was formed by correspondence and a purchase order which the parties agreed was a construction contract within the meaning of the HGCRA.

In November 2010 SW referred a dispute over disruption costs and loss and expense to adjudication and Mr John Bell was appointed as adjudicator. He rejected M&S' challenge to his jurisdiction on the ground that the issue referred to him had been decided in a previous adjudication by Ms Janey

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from