Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 FEBRUARY 2025

Withdrawal Of Admissions And Abuse Of Process: Key Principles

Macfarlanes LLP
Macfarlanes LLP
Contributor
Macfarlanes LLP

Macfarlanes LLP

Macfarlanes is a distinctive London-based law firm with a unique combination of services built and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Macfarlanes LLP

In William Andrew Tinkler v Esken Limited and others [2024] EWHC 1490 (Ch), the English High Court provided a useful analysis of the law in relation to: (1) when the court will permit a party to withdraw an admission.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In William Andrew Tinkler v Esken Limited and others [2024] EWHC 1490 (Ch), the English High Court provided a useful analysis of the law in relation to: (1) when the court will permit a party to withdraw an admission; and (2) the willingness of the English court to strike out claims which constitute an abuse of process, particularly where a litigant repeatedly seeks to reopen decided issues.

Background

This long running litigation relates to a boardroom dispute brought by Mr Tinkler regarding his removal as a director of, and dismissal as an employee of, a company for alleged misconduct.

Four previous phases to this litigation are relevant to understanding the issues in the present judgment:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from