Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 JULY 2020

When Is Bolitho Not Bolitho? Bradfield-Kay V Cope

An interesting case in which judgment was relatively recently handed down is that of Thomas Bradfield-Kay v Marcus Cope...

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Jock Mackenzie
Jock Mackenzie

An interesting case in which judgment was relatively recently handed down is that of Thomas Bradfield-Kay v Marcus Cope [https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2020/1351.html] EWHC 1351 (QB) concerning the application of Bolitho to an orthopaedic clinical negligence case.

The case concerned whether the defendant, a consultant orthopaedic surgeon, was negligent in his performance of a left total hip replacement (THR) in the claimant on 18 December 2009 and with respect to a subsequent consultation on 9 August 2010.

The claimant did not recover well from the THR, developing severe pain in his thigh and groin immediately after the operation. He allegedly reported these symptoms to the defendant during an appointment on 9 August 2010 but the latter did not carry out any investigations, although whether the symptoms were reported was in dispute. On 7 February 2011, the defendant saw the claimant and identified that painful clicking was likely due to the psoas

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from