Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 SEPTEMBER 2022

"Wagatha Christie": Adverse Inferences Can Be Drawn Where Evidence Has Been Lost

In the recent case of Vardy v Rooney, the High Court provided useful guidance as to how it will deal with the issue of lost or missing evidence.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Key Takeaways:

  • In the recent case of Vardy v Rooney, the High Court provided useful guidance as to how it will deal with the issue of lost or missing evidence.
  • The court can draw adverse inferences against a party where data has been lost; particularly where the loss appears deliberate. This can have a significant impact on the outcome of civil litigation.
  • Document retention and preservation procedures should therefore be strictly adhered to in order to minimise the risk of such adverse inferences being drawn.

In the recent (and widely publicised) case of Vardy v Rooney [2022] EWHC 2017 (QB), the High Court provided useful guidance as to how it will deal with the issue of lost or missing evidence.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from