Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 JUNE 2018

Valuing Bungled Litigation, Edwards v Hugh James Ford Simey

The broad principles as to how to value what has been lost from bungled litigation have been established for a long time.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The broad principles as to how to value what has been lost from bungled litigation have been established for a long time. In assessing what the claimant has lost through his lawyers' negligence, most commonly in failing to issue a claim within the limitation period, the court does not attempt to try the original case. Instead, it values the claimant's lost chose in action. Thus, for instance, suppose he had a 50% chance of obtaining £100,000, then (depending on the circumstances) he will be awarded about £50,000 damages in the professional negligence action. The Court will also attempt to set a notional trial or settlement date, value the claim as at that date, and award interest on it from then until trial in the professional negligence action.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from