Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 MAY 2025

Supreme Court Judgment Explained: Cutting Through The Noise

Herrington Carmichael LLP
Herrington Carmichael LLP
Contributor
Herrington Carmichael LLP

Herrington Carmichael LLP

The origins of the practice can be traced back over 180 years in Wokingham and 150 in Aldershot. It...

View firm profile
Explore more from Herrington Carmichael LLP

The recent Supreme Court decision in For Women Scotland Ltd (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent) has attracted significant public and media interest.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Introduction

The recent Supreme Court decision in For Women Scotland Ltd (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent) has attracted significant public and media interest. This article aims to cut through the noise by setting out the background to the case, explaining the Supreme Court's ruling, and consider the implications for employers.

Background to the case

The case was brought by campaigners, For Women Scotland, against the Scottish Government in relation to the Gender Representation on Public Boards (Scotland) Act 2018 and the accompanying statutory guidance. The legislation aimed to promote gender equality on public sector boards but concerns were raised over the definition of "woman" in the guidance. This guidance stated that 'woman' included biological women and those proposing to undergo, are undergoing or have undergone gender reassignment.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from