Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 AUGUST 2021

Service By Email – A Survivor's Guide

Mills & Reeve LLP
Mills & Reeve LLP
Contributor

Mills & Reeve LLP

Mills & Reeve’s staff thrive on developing great relationships and love helping clients find...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mills & Reeve LLP

Unauthorised or non-compliant service by email is causing problems for litigants and their solicitors. We review the rules and the prospect of getting relief from the court.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Unauthorised or non-compliant service by email is causing problems for litigants and their solicitors. We review the rules and the prospect of getting relief from the court.

In 2018 the Supreme Court in Barton v Wright Hassall  took a strict line about the unauthorised service of claim forms by email. Mr Barton was a litigant in person and hadn't spotted the special rules in Practice Direction 6A paragraph 4 about service by fax and email. He'd already had some email correspondence with the defendant's solicitors and assumed he could serve the claim form on them using the same method.

The court refused to help him out using its powers to validate defective service under CPR 6.15.  He should have read the rules.  He had courted disaster by issuing the claim at the very end of the limitation period.  He then made no attempt to serve the claim form until the very end of its four month period of validity.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from