Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 OCTOBER 2015

RTA v Bracewell (High Court, March 2015)

The claimant carried on business as business transfer agents and agreed, for a fee, to find a buyer for the defendant's business.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The claimant carried on business as business transfer agents and agreed, for a fee, to find a buyer for the defendant's business. A dispute arose, the defendant failed to pay the balance of the fee due, and the claimant issued proceedings for recovery. The defendant contended that the agreement was not enforceable for illegality, on the basis that:

  • The claimant's activities fell within the definition of "estate agency work" in s.1(1) of the Estate Agents Act 1979
  • The claimant therefore fell within the remit of the Money Laundering Regulations 2007 ("the Regulations")
  • In breach of the Regulations, the claimant was not registered with the OFT

The court dismissed both the claim and counterclaim. Whilst the claimant's failure to register with the OFT did not indicate dishonesty or turpitude (and the OFT plainly took the same view, as it had not sought to impose any civil penalty on, or to prosecute, the claimant), so as to render the contract void for

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from