Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 MAY 2026

Refusal To Mediate Was Not Unreasonable And Did Not Warrant Costs Sanction

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Contributor
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

We have one of the largest Southeast Asia international law practices, working across the region...

View firm profile
Explore more from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

It was important to consider the full background of discussions between the parties in considering reasonableness.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

It was important to consider the full background of discussions between the parties in considering reasonableness. 

The Technology and Construction Court (TCC) has held that neither a successful defendant's refusal to mediate nor a last-minute change in its expert's evidence warranted a departure from the usual order that it should be paid its costs of the litigation: MJS Projects (March) Ltd v RPS Consulting Services Ltd [2026] EWHC 884 (TCC).

The defendant's refusal to mediate was not unreasonable in circumstances where the claimant had failed to engage with a number of issues that the defendant had raised and where the defendant needed to understand the claimant's expert evidence in order to proceed with mediation. The defendant had also proposed other forms of ADR and made settlement offers throughout.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from