Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 DECEMBER 2016

Paying Parties: Don't Put Off Payment Forever By Repeatedly Requesting Further Information

Wedlake Bell LLP
Wedlake Bell LLP
Contributor
Wedlake Bell LLP

Wedlake Bell LLP

Wedlake Bell provides clients with a full package of legal services delivering commercial and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Wedlake Bell LLP

AMD, an M&E works subcontractor, was engaged by Cumberland for works at Hilton Hotel on Park Lane, London. AMD sought payment of a final account.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

AMD Environmental Ltd v Cumberland Construction Co Ltd [2016] EWHC 285 (TCC)

AMD, an M&E works subcontractor, was engaged by Cumberland for works at Hilton Hotel on Park Lane, London.  AMD sought payment of a final account.  Cumberland disagreed with the amount claimed and so AMD commenced an adjudication.  Cumberland argued that the dispute had not crystallised by the date on which the Claimant issued its adjudication notice, a point which the adjudicator rejected pointing to (among other things) the five month gap between the application for payment and the notice of adjudication. The adjudicator decided on the amount of the final account and sums were due together with interest from Cumberland, which Cumberland did not pay.  AMD commenced court enforcement proceedings for Summary Judgment which was granted. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from