Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 SEPTEMBER 2021

Latest Word On Fatal Accidents

Gatehouse Chambers
Gatehouse Chambers
Contributor

Gatehouse Chambers

Gatehouse Chambers is a leading commercial set with expertise spanning commercial dispute...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gatehouse Chambers

The Court of Appeal has looked at fatal accidents law twice recently making useful observations which can assist our understanding of the proper approach in two tricky areas.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Court of Appeal has looked at fatal accidents law twice recently making useful observations which can assist our understanding of the proper approach in two tricky areas.

In Rix v Paramount [2021] EWCA Civ 1172, on appeal by a Defendant, the Court revisited the proper approach to quantification in so-called “wealth creator” cases. This is another case where the Courts have had to grapple with where to draw the line between a compensatable loss of dependency based on income earned by a Deceased's entrepreneurial acumen and hard work and a situation where no loss is proven as the dependants have inherited an income generating and/or valuable capital asset not reliant upon the Deceased's continued work. The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against the trial judge's determination that in that case. There was a loss of dependency as it was based on an income stream generated by the Deceased's skill and dedication, not an asset which the dependants would inherit.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from