We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.
ARTICLE · 03 APRIL 2011
Interpretation Of Section 2(a)(iii) Of The ISDA Master Agreement
Shoosmiths
In Lomas and Others v JFB Firth Rixson, Inc and Others [2010] EWHC 3372 (Ch), the High Court considered the meaning and effect of Section 2(a)(iii) of the ISDA Master Agreement (1992 and 2002 versions), which provides that the payment obligations of the parties are subject to the condition precedent that no event of default is continuing with respect to the other party.
United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration













