Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 OCTOBER 2016

Ignorance (Of Senior Managers) Is Not Always Bliss

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

In a judgment harking back to the principles in Donoghue v Stevenson, the Court of Appeal has upheld the High Court's decision that the manufacturer of a defective product installed to prevent fire was not liable...

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In a judgment harking back to the principles in Donoghue v Stevenson, the Court of Appeal has upheld the High Court's decision that the manufacturer of a defective product installed to prevent fire was not liable for a fire which destroyed a factory.

The rationale was that employees of the factory were in fact aware of the malfunction and had therefore introduced an alternative system to avoid fire, rather than rely on the faulty device. This knowledge was attributed to the owners of the factory.

The Facts

The Appellant, Howmet, manufactured precision components for the aerospace industry. Part of its manufacturing process included dipping metal castings into a series of tanks containing hot acid and water known as a grain etch line ("GEL"). The tanks in the GEL included various "thermolevel" sensors which were designed to measure both the temperature and level of liquid in the tanks, and to switch off the heater if the liquid fell below a specified level in

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from