Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 SEPTEMBER 2026

Funding Of Collective Redress Claims – The Latest Developments In Group Litigation

Mills & Reeve LLP
Mills & Reeve LLP
Contributor

Mills & Reeve LLP

Mills & Reeve’s staff thrive on developing great relationships and love helping clients find...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mills & Reeve LLP

Collective redress claims face mounting costs pressures and complex funding arrangements that can trigger unexpected satellite litigation. Recent high-profile cases reveal how litigation funders and claimants' solicitors navigate tensions between justice for claimants and commercial realities, with disputes over settlement proceeds and loan agreements creating new battlegrounds beyond the original claims.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Collective redress claims are an established feature of the civil litigation landscape. The commonest mechanisms are representative claims and group litigation orders (GLOs). By definition they involve a number of claims so are not small or low value, but there is a wide range from GLOs involving a few hundred individuals to behemoths like the NOx emissions cases, which involved 13 separate GLOs of which four were selected as lead GLOs.

Even a small GLO will involve proactive case management and regular contact between the parties: large GLOs involve multiple applications and costs and case management conferences (CCMCs), including CCMCs built into the trial timetable. Woe betide the solicitors who cannot keep all the juggling balls in the air, as the rugby head injuries litigation has recently shown.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from