Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 APRIL 2018

Fundamental Dishonesty: Claimant's exaggerated symptoms treated with Section 57

Clyde & Co has concluded the dismissal of a high value claim pursuant to Section 57 Fundamental Dishonesty after the Court found that the Claimant's evidence to her medical experts was wholly misleading.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Aimee Turner v Michael Heap Limited [2018] CC (Bradford) 08/02/2018

Clyde & Co has concluded the dismissal of a high value claim pursuant to Section 57 Fundamental Dishonesty after the Court found that the Claimant's evidence to her medical experts was wholly misleading.

The Judge concluded that the reports had no evidential value, causation for the injury could not be established and accordingly the general damages claim failed. The Judge then utilised Section 57 to dismiss the entirety of the claim.

Background

The Claimant alleged she had suffered a substantial injury and psychological damage, claiming numerous associated heads of loss.

We established several inconsistencies in the Claimant's medical evidence:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from