Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 MARCH 2022

Francesca O'Neill Successful In Professional Negligence Trial

Since SAAMCO, and latterly MBS v Grant Thornton [2021] UKSC 20, lawyers generally think that they understand how arguments on the scope of duty for professionals should run.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Professionals' scope of duty examined at trial: some thoughts

Harry v Curtis Law LLP ("CWC")

HHJ Mitchell

Since SAAMCO, and latterly MBS v Grant Thornton [2021] UKSC 20, lawyers generally think that they understand how arguments on the scope of duty for professionals should run. The law is constantly developing, but scope of duty is now rarely controversial. Despite that, the Claimant – a 2018 purchaser of a new build house on a large housing development in Derriford, Plymouth – got it wrong.

She had reserved the show home on an early phase of the development, on a quiet residential street, surrounded by what she assumed would be other quiet residential streets. CWC were a firm of local solicitors who had acted for her in selling a previous home, and the abortive purchase of another central Plymouth house. They acted for her on a low fixed fee conveyancing package. The scope of the written retainer promised to investigate title, and perform local authority

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from