Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 APRIL 2011

Footnotes – April 2011

In United Company Rusal PLC and others v HSBC Bank PLC and others (2011) the court considered whether to make a Norwich Pharmacal order against the firm Debevoise & Plimpton LLP for disclosure of documents.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Kate Ayres
Kate Ayres

Norwich Pharmacal order sought against lawyers

In United Company Rusal PLC and others v HSBC Bank PLC and others (2011) the court considered whether to make a Norwich Pharmacal order against the firm Debevoise & Plimpton LLP for disclosure of documents. The applicants (Rusal) were part of a large corporation in Russia who were in dispute with an investor (Interros) over the control and management of Norilsk Nickel. Proceedings had been commenced by Rusal in a number of jurisdictions and disclosure was sought in support of proceedings in Russia and Nevis, to evidence an agreement between the relevant parties and the documents obtained by the firm under the Money Laundering Regulations.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from