Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 JUNE 2025

Disclosures As Representations? High Court Examines A Misrepresentation Claim In Disclosure Letters.

In Veranova Bidco LP v Johnson Matthey Plc and Others [2025] EWHC 707 (Comm), the High Court considered whether a seller's statements in a draft disclosure letter exchanged...

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Veranova Bidco LP v Johnson Matthey Plc and Others [2025] EWHC 707 (Comm), the High Court considered whether a seller's statements in a draft disclosure letter exchanged during transaction negotiations could amount to fraudulent misrepresentation. The Court refused an application by the sellers for summary judgment or strike-out, concluding that the buyer's deceit claim had a real prospect of success.

The key issue was whether such disclosures, which are typically used to qualify warranties in a share purchase agreement (SPA), could also be actionable representations. The judgment left open the possibility that under certain factual circumstances, disclosures might indeed constitute misrepresentations.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from