Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 OCTOBER 2021

Disclosure Applications In Preference Claim

Mills & Reeve LLP
Mills & Reeve LLP
Contributor

Mills & Reeve LLP

Mills & Reeve’s staff thrive on developing great relationships and love helping clients find...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mills & Reeve LLP

The Liquidator claimed against the Respondent to recover a payment of £115 million as an alleged preference under s.239 IA 1986.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Jacob Walker
Jacob Walker

The Liquidator claimed against the Respondent to recover a payment of £115 million as an alleged preference under s.239 IA 1986. The Respondent was connected with the company for the purposes of s.239, so there is therefore a rebuttable presumption of a desire to prefer.

Extended Model D Disclosure was ordered on the "desire to prefer" issue. However the Liquidator later applied for the more extensive Model E disclosure, and in particular sought information relating to the deletion of potentially relevant documents and data.

Separately, the Respondent applied for Model C Extended disclosure on the issue of the Liquidator's concerns and conclusions arising from his investigations. The Respondent also sought to widen the scope of disclosure on the company's revolving credit facility and its impact on solvency. All applications were refused. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from