Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 JULY 2019

Costs: Successful Appeal To High Court's Better Judgment On Part 36

The High Court has overturned a decision which held that the Court may apply the 'injustice' test separately for each part of CPR 36.17(4).

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

JLE v Warrington & Halton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2019] EWHC 1582 (QB)

The High Court has overturned a decision which held that the Court may apply the 'injustice' test separately for each part of CPR 36.17(4).

Background

The Claimant presented a Bill of Costs in the sum of £615,751.51, and made a Part 36 offer of £425,000 inclusive of interest. The offer expired and at detailed assessment, the Claimant was awarded £431,813.05, therefore beating their offer.

During the assessment, the Claimant invited the Court to award the consequences of paragraphs (a), (b), (c) and (d) of CPR Part 36.17.

Applying paragraph (d) would have result in an additional 10% being awarded.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from