Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 SEPTEMBER 2012

Controversial Constitutional Court Ruling On Advance Costs Orders

The Constitutional Court has ruled that a claimant’s rights to judicial protection and to a fair trial were infringed by an order to pay advance costs of €792,850.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Tomáš Borecký
Tomáš Borecký
Ian Parker
Ian Parker

The Constitutional Court has ruled that a claimant's rights to judicial protection and to a fair trial were infringed by an order to pay advance costs of €792,850.

The basis for the decision was that:

  • a party's right to a court proceeding, although not absolute, must be effective and could not either be limited by the court or reduced in a way which affected the subject of the litigation;
  • an order to pay €792,850 in advance costs (in addition to the maximum court fee) was a disproportionate and arbitrary restriction on the Claimant's right to a court proceeding, because this was enough to pay its legal fees 30 times over; 
  • the District Court had failed to examine the claimant's means to pay this amount of advance costs.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from