Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 JULY 2024

Consumer Rights Can Render An Otherwise Valid Arbitration Award Unenforceable

K&L Gates
K&L Gates
Contributor
K&L Gates

K&L Gates

The Firm K&L Gates is an integrated, international law firm. As a single global law firm, truly...

View firm profile
Explore more from K&L Gates

The UK Court of Appeal has upheld the enforcement of a US$64 million Hong Kong arbitration award against Mrs. Zhang, rejecting her claim that the UK Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA) should override the award. Lord Justice Males clarified that if the CRA applied and was breached, it could nullify an arbitration award on public policy grounds. This highlights the importance for consumer-facing businesses to carefully consider contract terms, dispute resolution clauses, and local laws, particularly i

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A warning to all consumer-facing businesses: the UK's Court of Appeal has upheld the enforcement of a US$64 million Hong Kong-seated arbitration award against a Mrs Zhang, rejecting her argument that she was protected by the UK Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA).1

So far so unremarkable. But, apart from convoluted underlying facts which Lord Justice Stephen Males (Males LJ) likened to "the facts of a students' moot," the case is notable for more substantive comments made by Males LJ in the leading judgment. He made clear that, if the CRA applied and was infringed, consumer rights would prevail over an arbitration award on UK public policy grounds, and the court would have to refuse enforcement of the award.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from