Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 JANUARY 2007

Commercial Dispute Resolution Briefing, December 2006

Section 45 of the Arbitration Act 1996 provides the court with a discretionary power to determine questions of law. The court can, therefore, refuse an application if it is not persuaded that it should make a determination at that stage.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Arbitration

(1) Taylor Woodrow Holdings Ltd, (2) George Wimpey Southern Counties Ltd v Barnes & Elliott Ltd*

Court has discretion to decide whether or not to determine a question of law referred to it under section 45 of the Arbitration Act

Section 45 of the Arbitration Act 1996 provides the court with a discretionary power to determine questions of law. The court can, therefore, refuse an application if it is not persuaded that it should make a determination at that stage. Here, the parties' construction agreement provided that either party could apply to the court to determine any question of law. A dispute arose as to whether a question on the retention of risk in unforeseen structural works amounted to a question of law which the court should determine or whether the court retained a discretion and the question was more suited to a specialist construction law arbitrator chosen by the parties. The High Court confirmed that the power was discretionary, explaining that the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from