Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 APRIL 2008

Commercial Dispute Resolution Briefing, April 2008

Court demonstrates support for arbitration in holding that arbitration agreements in a commercial context are to be liberally construed.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

ARBITRATION

Premium Nafta Products Ltd (20th defendant) & Ors v Fili Shipping Co Ltd (14th claimant) & Ors*



The House of Lords has reaffirmed the view that arbitration agreements made in a commercial context should be liberally construed. The claimants had launched court proceedings alleging inducement by bribery to enter into charterparty agreements, whilst the defendants sought to rely on the arbitration agreement in each charterparty which provided that any dispute "arising under" the charter should be referred to arbitration. The House of Lords agreed with the findings of the Court of Appeal (under case title Fiona Trust & Ors v Privalov & Ors (January 2007)), upholding the presumption that by including such a clause the parties intended to refer all disputes arising out of the relationship to arbitration, unless expressly stated otherwise. Their Lordships also agreed

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from