Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JULY 2023

Case Comment: Boydell v NZP Ltd & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 373

Gatehouse Chambers
Gatehouse Chambers
Contributor

Gatehouse Chambers

Gatehouse Chambers is a leading commercial set with expertise spanning commercial dispute...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gatehouse Chambers

The Court of Appeal recently handed down judgment in the case of Boydell v NZP Ltd & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 373, in which an employee challenged the High Court's decision to sever parts...

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Court of Appeal recently handed down judgment in the case of Boydell v NZP Ltd & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 373, in which an employee challenged the High Court's decision to sever parts of a restrictive covenant, and then grant an interim injunction enforcing the amended terms.

The judgment provides an interesting development to the case law on enforcement of post-employment restrictive covenants and will be of interest to employers and employees, whose main area of dispute is not the employee's actions, but rather the covenant's enforceability. The approval of the High Court's decision demonstrates flexibility at the interlocutory stage to ensure a level of protection over employers' interests pending a full trial, avoiding an all-or-nothing approach to the enforceability of restrictive covenants. The judgment also provides insight into what case merits the parties may be required to show in particular circumstances, including the nature, extent and complexity of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from