Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 MAY 2011

Calling Time On Limitation?

A further limitation decision which is good news for professionals and their insurers has recently been made.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Richard Harrison
Richard Harrison

A further limitation decision which is good news for professionals and their insurers has recently been made. The Court of Appeal in Lane v Cullens Solicitors & Others has again declined to follow Law Society v Sephton, which was a landmark decision in 2006 that delayed the commencement of the limitation period in a professional negligence claim.

Legal background

The six-year primary limitation period in tort is six years from the date that actual, rather than prospective, damage was suffered. There have been a number of key cases on the question of when damage was suffered, the most well known of which is Law Society v Sephton.

In Sephton the Law Society was required to compensate clients affected by the negligence of a reporting accountant in failing to spot that a solicitor was misappropriating client funds during his examination of the firm's accounts. The House of Lords found that actual damage was only suffered when a defrauded client first presented the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from