Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 JANUARY 2015

Breach Of Interdict – A Cautionary Tale

Yesterday saw businessman Paul MacKenzie sentenced to 10 months imprisonment after he repeatedly breached an interdict against him.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Yesterday saw businessman Paul MacKenzie sentenced to 10 months imprisonment after he repeatedly breached an interdict against him.

An interdict, the Scottish equivalent to an injunction in England, is a court order which prohibits a person from acting in a specific way in breach of another's legal rights. If an interdict is breached, possible punishments imposed by the court include a fine or imprisonment.

Mr MacKenzie previously owned a debt recovery business, MacKenzie Hall Holdings, but sold it to an American firm for a reported £33.5m. As part of the sale agreement Mr McKenzie agreed not to compete with his old business. After he broke the terms of the agreement by working for a rival company, an interdict was obtained from court ordering him to stop working for the rival. However Mr MacKenzie frequently ignored the court order and even divulged confidential information about his old business on one occasion. He admitted the breaches of interdict in 2012.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from