Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 OCTOBER 2017

Arbitration - UMS Holding v Great Station (High Court)

The defendants' section 68 challenge to an arbitration award was (pursuant to the court's order) heard in public. The award was referred to during the hearing and in the judgment.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Case Alert - [2017] EWHC 2473 (Comm)

Court rules on confidentiality of an arbitral award

The defendants' section 68 challenge to an arbitration award was (pursuant to the court's order) heard in public. The award was referred to during the hearing and in the judgment. The challenge failed and the claimants argued that the award was a public document and so they are free to make such use of it as they wish. The defendants countered that the claimants were bound by Article 30 of the LCIA Rules, which requires the parties "to keep confidential all awards in the arbitration, together with all materials in the arbitration created for the purpose of the arbitration and all other documents produced by another party in the proceedings not otherwise in the public domain, save to the extent that disclosure may be required ..by legal duty....or to enforce or challenge an award in legal proceedings...."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from