Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 OCTOBER 2014

Another ‘Wake Up’ Call For In‐House Lawyers

Alastair Brett v Solicitors Regulation Authority; a recent reminder to in‐house lawyers of their dual duties to client and Court – a cautionary tale all in‐house lawyers should have across their radars.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Alastair Brett v Solicitors Regulation Authority1; a recent reminder to in‐house lawyers of their dual duties to client and Court – a cautionary tale all in‐house lawyers should have across their radars.

KEY POINTS:

  • THE DUTY TO THE COURT IS FIRST AND FOREMOST AND WILL 'TRUMP' THE DUTY TO THE CLIENT WHEN THE TWO CONFLICT.
  • IN-HOUSE LAWYERS OWE DUTIES TO THEIR CLIENT – THE BUSINESS – AND AS FIDUCIARIES ARE NOT MERELY FUNCTIONARIES OF THE BUSINESS.
  • IN-HOUSE LAWYERS SHOULD HAVE IN PLACE CLEAR POLICIES, PROCESSES AND PROTOCOLS AROUND IDENTIFYING THE 'CLIENT', PRIVILEGE AND WAIVER.
  • IN-HOUSE LAWYERS SHOULD ALSO HAVE IN PLACE CLEAR POLICIES, PROCESSES AND PROTOCOLS AROUND ETHICS SUCH AS 'UP THE LINE REPORTING'.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from