Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 APRIL 2016

All's Well That Ends Well…For £250

Bacciottini v Gotelee & Goldsmith [2016] EWCA Civ 170 is a reminder of two of the core principles of the law of delict. First, a claimant has a duty to mitigate their losses.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Bacciottini v Gotelee & Goldsmith [2016] EWCA Civ 170 is a reminder of two of the core principles of the law of delict. First, a claimant has a duty to mitigate their losses. Secondly, they should be put back in the position they would have been in, but for the negligence. No more, no less.

This appeal raised the issue of the level of damages arising out of admitted negligence on the part of the respondent solicitors, Gotelee & Goldsmith. In May 2007 Bacciottini acquired a residential property. Their solicitors negligently failed to advise them that there was a planning restriction attached to the property restricting its residential use.

Following the successful purchase Bacciottini secured the removal of the planning restriction. This application to the local authority cost them £250. They had sued for £100,000, being the difference between the price they paid and the value of the property with the planning restriction.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from