Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 JUNE 2018

Trade Marks: Distinctiveness – Distinctly Necessary To Succeed?

Brodies LLP
Brodies LLP
Contributor
Brodies LLP

Brodies LLP

Brodies LLP is a prominent UK law firm, headquartered in Scotland, that provides expert advice to...

View firm profile
Explore more from Brodies LLP

Recent weeks have seen the rejection of two trade mark applications, at EU and UK level, on the basis that they were just not distinctive enough.

United KingdomIntellectual Property

Recent weeks have seen the rejection of two trade mark applications, at EU and UK level, on the basis that they were just not distinctive enough. So what does it take to make a trade mark distinctive and why does incorporating a logo or unusual font not always provide the ticket to clearance?

Rejection of application

On 20 May 2016, German company Item Industrietechnik GmbH ('Item') applied to register the figurative EU trade mark, "Efuse", ?at the EU Intellectual Property Office ('EUIPO').

They sought registration in Class 7 for goods such as, electric generators, motors and engines and in Class 9 for goods such as apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching... and controlling electricity. The EUIPO examiner rejected the application in Class 7 and for such goods in Class 9 on the basis that the mark would be understood as meaning "electric fuse" and therefore was descriptive of the goods covered. Additionally, the examiner decided that the graphic

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from