Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 MARCH 2018

The Truth About Fundamental Dishonesty

Three years ago, new legislation in England and Wales filled a gap that has existed in third-party personal injury claims.

United KingdomInsurance

As insurers get to grips with the implications of section 57's definition of fundamental dishonesty, Clyde & Co's Damian Rourke shows how the legislation can halt exaggerated third-party claims early.

Three years ago, new legislation in England and Wales filled a gap that has existed in third-party personal injury claims. In a first-party claim, the duty of utmost good faith has always meant that, in the event of a claimant behaving dishonestly, the claim could be dismissed. But in third-party claims, the potential to respond in this way did not exist – until section 57 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 (CJCA) introduced the concept of fundamental dishonesty. This legislation handed insurers a new weapon in the battle against dishonest claimants, but in the three years since its introduction, relatively few have sought to use it.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from