Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 JULY 2021

Validation Orders Under Section 284 Insolvency Act

Mills & Reeve LLP
Mills & Reeve LLP
Contributor

Mills & Reeve LLP

Mills & Reeve’s staff thrive on developing great relationships and love helping clients find...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mills & Reeve LLP

The Court has recently upheld a refusal to validate payments to fund connected litigation where there was no evidence of a corresponding benefit to the bankruptcy proceedings.

United KingdomInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

The Court has recently upheld a refusal to validate payments to fund connected litigation where there was no evidence of a corresponding benefit to the bankruptcy proceedings.

An individual, subject to a bankruptcy petition he was contesting, failed to appeal the refusal of a validation order to cover funding connected proceedings in India.

The respondent banks had presented a petition based on a judgment obtained in India and registered in England.  There were ongoing proceedings between the parties in India and the applicant already had one validation order covering his reasonable living expenses, as well as both the past and future costs of his bankruptcy petition.  He sought a further validation order to cover the past and future costs of the Indian litigation as well which he said, if successful, would provide him with a defence to the petition. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from