Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 SEPTEMBER 2021

Third Party Funded Creditor CVA Challenge

Mills & Reeve LLP
Mills & Reeve LLP
Contributor

Mills & Reeve LLP

Mills & Reeve’s staff thrive on developing great relationships and love helping clients find...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mills & Reeve LLP

Following creditor approval of Caffè Nero's company voluntary arrangement (CVA), a landlord creditor (LC) challenged the CVA on the basis that it was unfairly prejudicial to landlords...

United KingdomInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

Following creditor approval of Caffè Nero's company voluntary arrangement (CVA), a landlord creditor (LC) challenged the CVA on the basis that it was unfairly prejudicial to landlords and for material irregularity during the CVA decision procedure. The challenge was funded by a third party who intended to take over Caffè Nero. The third party paid LC £100,000 to not withdraw their challenge nor accept a settlement without the third party's consent.

Caffè Nero applied to strike out the CVA challenge and have summary judgment granted in its favour. Caffè Nero argued the challenge was an abuse of process and LC had no legitimate interest. Caffè Nero argued LC was the third party's ‘puppet', bringing the challenge for the third party's collateral purpose. Caffè Nero alleged that as LC had terminated the relevant lease pursuant to the CVA terms, they no longer had a legitimate interest to challenge the CVA.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from