Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 OCTOBER 2021

Challenging Valuations For Voting Purposes

Mills & Reeve LLP
Mills & Reeve LLP
Contributor

Mills & Reeve LLP

Mills & Reeve’s staff thrive on developing great relationships and love helping clients find...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mills & Reeve LLP

This case concerned a challenge made by a creditor (also a director) against a decision by an administrator to value another creditor's debt for voting purposes.

United KingdomInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

This case concerned a challenge made by a creditor (also a director) against a decision by an administrator to value another creditor's debt for voting purposes.

An administrator accepted a proof for voting purposes at around a third of its value. This had the effect of giving that creditor more than 90% of the overall voting rights and the administrator's proposals were approved. The decision was made in May but the director only discovered the valuation in July and considered the claim exaggerated. The administrators had sold some assets to a party connected with the creditor concerned.

An application to challenge the decision was made in August under IR 14.8 and 14.11, but these rules relate to adjudications on a proof for distribution purposes, not voting purposes. The correct rule was IR 15.35, but that application was now five months out of time. In view of that, the challenge could only proceed if the court was now prepared to extend the period of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from