Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 OCTOBER 2008

Short Marriages

Hunters Law LLP
Hunters Law LLP
Contributor
Hunters Law LLP

Hunters Law LLP

Hunters is known for combining top-class legal advice with exceptional, partner-led, personal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hunters Law LLP

As we know the duration of the marriage is one of the s.25 criteria in the 1973 legislation, specifically S.25 (d) where it is grouped with the ages of each of the parties to the marriage. For nearly thirty years I would have given much the same explanation as to the Courts approach to a short marriage.

United KingdomFamily and Matrimonial

It may be the society that I keep, but one of the wearisome aspects of being a family specialist is being called upon, when off duty, to justify the present state of the law relating to ancillary relief (not that they ever call it that), and it is the size of awards following a short marriage that is more often than not the topic of choice of the testy (usually male) dinner party companion. This article attempts to do that.

As we know the duration of the marriage is one of the s.25 criteria in the 1973 legislation, specifically S.25 (d) where it is grouped with the ages of each of the parties to the marriage. For nearly thirty years I would have given much the same explanation as to the Courts approach to a short marriage. Since 2001 however, that explanation would have had to have changed repeatedly, and only now, with Miller1 and McCartney2 do we seem to have arrived at a settled position again.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from