Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 JULY 2012

Reasonable Provision?

Hugh James
Hugh James
Contributor
Hugh James

Hugh James

Hugh James is a leading law firm, employing more than 680 staff from its headquarters in Cardiff...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hugh James

The Court of Appeal recently refused a widow permission to appeal against a first instance decision made by the Family Division of the High Court.

United KingdomFamily and Matrimonial
Matthew Evans
Matthew Evans

The Court of Appeal recently refused a widow permission to appeal against a first instance decision made by the Family Division of the High Court. The widow was seeking to appeal the earlier decision regarding the provision she would receive from her late husband's estate.

The late Mr Allport had left his entire estate to his wife in a will executed shortly before his death in 2006. The will, however, was not properly attested and, as such, his estate was distributable under the terms of an earlier will. In the earlier will his interest in his company (valued at trial at £8.3 million) passed to his son from a previous marriage.

As a result, Mrs Allport applied to the court for "reasonable financial provision" under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, by virtue of her capacity as spouse of the deceased.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from