Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 JUNE 2018

Zero Hours Contracts And Full-Time Permanent Contracts: Not Always So Different

Dentons
Dentons
Contributor
Dentons

Dentons

The Firm Across over 80 countries, Dentons helps you grow, protect, operate and finance your...

View firm profile
Explore more from Dentons

In the recent case of Roddis v Sheffield Hallam University, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) found that an employee on a zero hours contract could compare himself to a colleague on a full-time contract for the purposes of bringing a claim for less favourable treatment under the Part-Time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000 (the PTW Regulations).

United KingdomEmployment and HR

In the recent case of Roddis v Sheffield Hallam University, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) found that an employee on a zero hours contract could compare himself to a colleague on a full-time contract for the purposes of bringing a claim for less favourable treatment under the Part-Time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000 (the PTW Regulations).

Mr Roddis was employed by Sheffield Hallam University (the University) as a part-time associate lecturer. He brought various claims against the University which included a claim for less favourable treatment under the PTW Regulations.  For the purposes of this part of his claim, he sought to compare himself with a colleague, who was also a lecturer, but on a full-time permanent contract.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from