Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 APRIL 2015

The Compensation Act 2006 Should Not Be Overlooked

The much lauded Compensation Act 2006 was billed as something that would free organisers of fun events from liability on the basis that it is good for society to have exciting activities going on.

United KingdomEmployment and HR

Humphrey v Aegis Defence Services Limited [2014] QBD Uren v Corporate Leisure (UK) Ltd (2013) EWHC 353 (QB)

Introduction

The much lauded Compensation Act 2006 was billed as something that would free organisers of fun events from liability on the basis that it is good for society to have exciting activities going on.

Section 1 of the Act provides that in considering a claim for negligence or breach of statutory duty, the Court can consider whether imposition of a duty might discourage desirable activities taking place.

The Act has been considered in two recent employers' liability claims.

Humphrey

The Claimant was a former marine and a bodyguard working for the Defendant, a security company.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from