Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 AUGUST 2011

Redundancy And Alternative Employment

The EAT considers the tricky issue of redundant employees’ refusal of suitable alternative employment.

United KingdomEmployment and HR
Barry Mordsley
Barry Mordsley
James Davies
James Davies

Originally published in People Management, 8th August 2011.

Bird v Stoke-on-Trent Primary Care Trust

The EAT considers the tricky issue of redundant employees' refusal of suitable alternative employment

Handling redundancy can be daunting for both employers and employees. There may be a substantial redundancy payment involved and the dismissal could lead to an unfair dismissal claim.

There is a requirement for employers and redundant employees to consider suitable alternative employment. An employee's unreasonable refusal of alternative work could mean an employer does not have to make a redundancy payment. The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) recently had to consider these issues in the case of Bird v Stoke-on-Trent Primary Care Trust.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from