Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 JULY 2016

Post-Termination Restrictions - Consideration Reconsidered?

Withers LLP
Withers LLP
Contributor
Withers LLP

Withers LLP

Withers is an international law firm focused on the personal, business and philanthropic interests...

View firm profile
Explore more from Withers LLP

It had been generally accepted that an employer who wished to introduce post-termination restrictions after an employee has commenced employment would have to provide a tangible benefit (e.g. a pay rise).

United KingdomEmployment and HR

It had been generally accepted that an employer who wished to introduce post-termination restrictions after an employee has commenced employment would have to provide a tangible benefit (e.g. a pay rise). This principle, however, has been cast into doubt after two High Court decisions in June 2016 which appear to go against the grain of previous case law.

The first of the cases was Pickwell & Nicholls v Pro Cam CP Ltd, as discussed in 'Doing a deal – introducing enforceable post-termination restrictions', which took the view that providing employees with the opportunity to progress in their careers through continued employment and access to clients was sufficient to achieve a binding agreement.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from