Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 JULY 2012

Pilon Clauses: No Clawback For Misconduct

DMH Stallard LLP
DMH Stallard LLP
Contributor
DMH Stallard LLP

DMH Stallard LLP

DMH Stallard delivers successful outcomes for businesses and individuals by providing tailored...

View firm profile
Explore more from DMH Stallard LLP

The Court of Appeal has held that an employee who had his employment terminated on the basis that he would receive a payment in lieu of notice remained entitled to the payment, even though his employer had later discovered his gross misconduct was sufficient to warrant summary dismissal.

United KingdomEmployment and HR

Cavenagh v William Evans Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 697

The Court of Appeal has held that an employee who had his employment terminated on the basis that he would receive a payment in lieu of notice remained entitled to the payment, even though his employer had later discovered his gross misconduct was sufficient to warrant summary dismissal.

Facts

Having confirmed that it would make a payment in lieu of notice, the employer subsequently discovered Mr Cavenagh's gross misconduct and decided not to honour its agreement to pay him in lieu, arguing that it was discharged from its obligation to do so in light of the misconduct that had been discovered. 

The County Court dismissed Mr Cavenagh's claim for recovery of his notice pay as a debt. It did so on the basis that the prior gross misconduct gave the company a complete defence to the claim. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from