Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 DECEMBER 2017

Lessons To Be Learned From Uber And Deliveroo

Dentons
Dentons
Contributor
Dentons

Dentons

The Firm Across over 80 countries, Dentons helps you grow, protect, operate and finance your...

View firm profile
Explore more from Dentons

Hot on the heels of the article in our last newsletter on Addison Lee and the "gig economy", on Friday 11 November 2017, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) confirmed an employment tribunal's...

United KingdomEmployment and HR

Aslam and others v. Uber BV and others

Hot on the heels of the article in our last newsletter on Addison Lee and the "gig economy", on Friday 11 November 2017, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) confirmed an employment tribunal's decision that Uber drivers should be classified as "workers" and are not self-employed. This is now the most high-profile case on the employment status of the so-called "gig economy" workforce. The full judgment can be found here.

Most of our readers will be familiar with this case. Two Uber drivers brought a claim for unlawful deductions from wages and a failure to provide paid leave. The drivers successfully persuaded an Employment Tribunal that they were workers and should be protected under the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA). Uber argued that they were self-employed and were not entitled to these protections.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from